TFTP implementation - Bounty offered!

Do you like to promote your wxWidgets based application or component!? Post it here and let's see what the critics have to say. Also, if you found that ONE wx component the world needs to know about, put it here for future reference.
Post Reply
hgiritzer
Knows some wx things
Knows some wx things
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:24 am
Location: Austria

TFTP implementation - Bounty offered!

Post by hgiritzer » Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:30 am

wxTFTP - Trivial File Transfer Protocol implementation.
Client AND Server, based on wxDatagramSocket (src/common/socket.cpp).
Offering a bounty of US$ 150 for finishing by March 31, 2005.
Helmut Giritzer - IMPLEMENTATION is DONE by Sjoerd Langkemper.
No further requests, please! I wish to thank all those, who have contacted me about this.

Implementation according to the following RFC's (the RFC's are very compact, as the protocol itself):
RFC 1350 - THE TFTP PROTOCOL (REVISION 2)
http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/cgi-bin/rfc/rfc1350.html
RFC 1782 - TFTP Option Extension
http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/cgi-bin/rfc/rfc1782.html
RFC 1783 - TFTP Blocksize Option
http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/cgi-bin/rfc/rfc1783.html
RFC 1784 - TFTP Timeout Interval and Transfer Size Options
http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/cgi-bin/rfc/rfc1784.html
Last edited by hgiritzer on Tue Apr 19, 2005 6:14 am, edited 2 times in total.

Avi
Super wx Problem Solver
Super wx Problem Solver
Posts: 398
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:27 pm
Location: Tel-Aviv, Israel

Post by Avi » Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:24 pm

Since the wxDatagramSocket isn't officially supported (nor developed?), do you think it would be wise to base a whole project using it? :?

hgiritzer
Knows some wx things
Knows some wx things
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:24 am
Location: Austria

Post by hgiritzer » Thu Mar 10, 2005 7:38 am

Avi wrote:Since the wxDatagramSocket isn't officially supported (nor developed?), do you think it would be wise to base a whole project using it? :?
As far as I know, wxDatagramSocket is currently the best (only?) class for UDP communication.
So, as everything might change at some time, I think it is quite ok to use it as base. I'm not afraid of changes, as they are usually acompanied with improvements :P
But, I may be wrong, so if someone has a better idea...
Outcome should be as described above.

Post Reply